Disposed

Darshan Rani & Anr. v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Jan 2018W.P.(CRL)/53/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition seeking non-interference of the father and police protection, the court directed the local police beat constable to provide assistance to petitioners residing in Delhi, despite state counsel's submission regarding their claimed outside-territory residence.

What did the court decide?

BEAT CONSTABLE TO BE APPRISED OF THE SITUATION AND HIS MOBILE NUMBER BE GIVEN TO PETITIONERS FOR POLICE ASSISTANCE.

Darshan Rani & Anr. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors. — Delhi HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 53/2018 & Crl. M.A No.329/2018

¶4

DARSHAN RANI & ANR.

¶5

..... Petitioners Through Ms.Pooja Pandey, Mr. S.C. Mohan and Mr. Alok Mohan, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.

¶8

		.....	Respondents
Through	Mr. R.S. Kundu	, ASC for	the State.
	Mr. Premsagar	Pal with	Mr. Bhagat
	Singh, Advs.
	ASI Asman	Singh,	PS City
	Ballavgarh Fari	dabad.
	Mr.Ram Kuma	r Tripath	i with Dr.
	Monika Gusain,	Advs. for	R-4.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

¶10

O R D E R % 09.01.2018

¶11

Parties are present in person. The matter was listed yesterday. The parents of petitioner no.1 were present. Parties had been sent for mediation so that the matter with regard to the apprehension (which the petitioner no.1 has qua her parents) could be settled. Parties have appeared before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. This Court has been informed that no settlement has been arrived at. The prayer in the present petition is that the father of the petitioner (arrayed as respondent no.5) should not interfere with the peaceful married life of the petitioners. Police protection has also

¶12

been sought for.

¶13

The petitioners are stated to be the residents of House No.13-B, Street No.6, Sai Baba Mandir, East Laxmi Market, Shakapur, Delhi. Learned counsel for the State submits that the address of the present petitioners as mentioned in the petitioner is of outside the State of Delhi and it may not be possible for the respondent to provide police protection if they are residents of outside the State of Delhi. The petitioners, however, have given the aforenoted address of Delhi. A beat constable of the local police be apprised of the situation and his mobile number be given to the petitioners in order that they can contact the beat constable in the case of need or emergency and he will provide police assistance to the petitioners.

¶14

Petition disposed of in the above terms.

¶15

INDERMEET KAUR, J

¶16

JANUARY 09, 2018 ndn

Darshan Rani & Anr. v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Darshan Rani & Anr. v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpendra Vs State

Rajeev @ Bobby Vs State

Puschpender Vs State

Om Prakash @ Raju Vs State

Shiv Kumar Vs Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Muthuvel Palani M. Vs C Angala Eswari & Ors.

Jitender Bhai Shah & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

S C Aggarwal Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Pushpendra Vs State

Rajeev @ Bobby Vs State

Naveen Ahuja Vs State

Rajinder Singh Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Abhinav Vs State

Sanjay & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.