Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition VP(CRL) 85/2018 after LOC expired. High Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
PRANAV NAGPAL ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Madhav Khurana with Ms.Aarushi Singh, Advocates.
versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Jyoti Babbar counsel for Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC. SI Data Ram, PS Dwarka.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 10.01.2018 Crl.M.A.No.514/2018 (Exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 85/2018
S.P.GARG, J.
JANUARY 10, 2018/ sa
Pranav Nagpal
State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi
S.P. GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
