Rohit Ghai v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a POCSO and IPC case. Counsel informed the court that a coordinate bench had already quashed the FIR. Complainant confirmed the quashing. Bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as withdrawn following quashing of the FIR.
What the court decided
$~7
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 123/2017
ROHIT GHAI ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Satish Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. Complainant present in person. SI Sushila, PS Tilak Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R
% 09.01.2018
- The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.736/2016 under Sections 323/452/342/506/34 IPC and Sections 9/11/12 of POCSO Act registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar. Status report is on record.
- During the course of arguments it was informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR in question has since been quashed by the Co-ordinate Bench of HMJ Indermeet Kaur. Complainant, who is present in person, informs that the FIR in question has since been quashed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should grant anticipatory bail or allow withdrawal when the underlying FIR has already been quashed by a coordinate bench.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rohit Ghai
- respondent
State
Coram
S.P. Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court