This order disposes a contempt petition alleging violation of a 2016 order. The court noted an agreement to withdraw the impugned letter, closing the contempt. A stay application was dismissed as infructuous.
Petition disposed as closed with exemption allowed; stay application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Varma and Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advs.
versus
G L MEENA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagat Bhuyan, Adv. for EDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 13.04.2018
CM. No. 14216/2018 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CONT.CAS(C) 261/2018
Present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging violation of order dated May 19, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before me the minutes of meeting dated April 11, 2018 wherein it has been agreed by the officers of the EDMC and BYPL that they will withdraw the letter dated March 28, 2018 because of which the petitioner will withdraw the present contempt petition.
As the order dated March 28, 2018, is being withdrawn though based
on the minutes of meeting dated March 23, 2018, the contempt is closed.
CM No. 14215/2018 (for stay)
Dismissed as infructuous.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 13, 2018 /jg
BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD
G L MEENA & ANR
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
