The court allowed an application for exemption and disposed of it. The connected writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions; Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yugant Kuhar, Adv. with Mr. Archit Vasudeva, Adv.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Adv. for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
CM No. 14487/2018
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 3657/2018 & CM No. 14486/2018 (for stay)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition
to enable the petitioner approach appropriate forum. The writ petition along
with connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 13, 2018 /ak
SH. AVINASH CHIRANJEEV
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
