Hearing of a writ petition where the counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw. The court granted leave and liberty to apply, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and disposed of it accordingly.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw; Petition dismissed as withdrawn and disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
POONAM SINGHI & ANR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr Anuj Dewan and Ms Palak Rohmetra, Advs.
versus
ASSETS CARE AND RECONSTRUCTION & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr R.S. Randhawa, Adv for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 10.05.2018
Mrs. Ahlawat, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the learned DRAT with an appropriate application for interim order in accordance with law.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition along with pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed off accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 10, 2018 bg
POONAM SINGHI & ANR
ASSETS CARE AND RECONSTRUCTION & ORS
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
DEEPA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
