The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an inter-departmental letter requesting the de-notification of FCI depots. The court held the petition was premature, mis-conceived, and based on mere apprehension as no fundamental rights were infringed.
The petition and the accompanying application CM No.1852/2018 were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shubhra Parashar along with Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Advs. for R1. Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Rajeev Pathak and Mr.Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for R3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
VINOD GOEL, J. (Oral)
Page 1 of 5
WP (C) 438/2018
Page 2 of 5
WP (C) 438/2018
Page 3 of 5
WP (C) 438/2018
Page 4 of 5
WP (C) 438/2018
obtaining the advice of CACLB. He submits that the said letter ex-facie bypass the procedure and deserved to be quashed.
VINOD GOEL, J.
MAY 11, 2018 “sandeep”
Page 5 of 5
WP (C) 438/2018
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a departmental request letter seeking de-notification of depots infringes the fundamental rights of contract labour unions.
Whether the petition challenging an inter-departmental advice letter is maintainable and premised on apprehension.
Whether the Central Government's request to expedite de-notification under the Contract Labour Act can be quashed.
FCI HANDLING WORKERS UNION
UNION OF INDIA
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
