This court disposed of an appeal filed by a former employee against his employer. The court accepted a settlement where the employer agreed to pay one month's salary equivalent to Rs. 60,000 to quash the litigation.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to pay one month's salary amounting to Rs. 60,000 to appellant within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
ANAND PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Advocate with Appellant in person.
versus
JINDAL ALUMINIUM LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Singh & Mr. Amit Nagar, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Aditya Vardhan, Advocate for R- 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 15.05.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2/Jindal Naturecure Institute states that to put a quietus to the litigation between the parties, they are willing to pay the appellant, Mr. Anand Prakash Sharma, one month’s salary amounting to a sum of Rs.60,000/- for the service rendered by the latter to them.
The appellant who appears in person states that the offer made on behalf of the respondent No.2 is acceptable to him.
In view of the foregoing, the present appeal is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to pay one month’s salary amounting to Rs.60,000/- to the appellant within two weeks from today, without demur.
Pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 15, 2018 as
Anand Prakash Sharma
Jindal Aluminium Ltd
Jindal Naturecure Institute
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
