The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition filed by Dr. Soobrat Roy for default and nonprosecution, noting that the petitioner had not appeared on several dates and was no longer interested in the matter.
The writ petition was dismissed for default and nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
..... Petitioner
versus
T.K.BANARJEE & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR O R D E R % 11.05.2018
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner today. There has been no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, since several dates of hearing. It appears that petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting this matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default and nonprosecution.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MAY 11, 2018 gb
DR. SOOBRAT ROY
T.K. BANARJEE & ORS.
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
