Rajeev Kumar an Others v. Batra Expo International
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was disposed of after the respondent handed over settlement amounts via demand drafts to the petitioner through counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
RAJEEV KUMAR AN OTHERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Atul T. Nagrajan, Advocate with petitioner no.1, 7, 9 & 10 in person.
versus
BATRA EXPO INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Aneja, Advocate with Ms.Chandrika Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R % 09.05.2018
Pursuant to the settlement dated 02.02.2018, Mr.Rajat Aneja, Advocate for the respondent has handed over four demand drafts of Rs.1,30,000/- each to the petitioner no.1, 7, 9 & 10 through their counsel Mr.Atul T. Nagarajan, Advocate. The photocopies of the demand drafts have been placed on record.
The petition is already disposed of.
VINOD GOEL, J.
MAY 09, 2018
“shailendra”
Rajeev Kumar And Others
Batra Expo International
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court