In this public interest litigation, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and reserved liberty to file a fresh PIL if the cause of action survives.
Permission to withdraw the PIL granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6pilst3485-17.doc
pvr 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Public Interest Litigation (St) NO. 3485 OF 2017
Deepak Narayan Borade ...Petitioner Versus Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation ...Respondents
Mr.Kamlesh Ghumre, for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.S.rao, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr.D.D.Madan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Mahesh Londhe with Mr.Anshuman Sugla i/b. M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co., for Respondent No.4.
Mr.P.P.Kakade, AGP for the State.
CORAM : DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C. J., & G.S.KULKARNI, J.
DATE : MARCH 10, 2017
P. C.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
Deepak Narayan Borade
Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation
Manjula Chellur
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
