Yasmin E. Tavaria v. the Union of India and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This rare judgment text lists writ and PIL details with petitions filed by Kedia, another person, and Tavaria against the Bar Council of India and the Union of India.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 463 OF 2017
Sandip Sankarlal Kedia And Anr V/S
Bar Council Of India And 2 Ors
....Petitioner
....Respondent
WITH
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 90 OF 2016
Yasmin E. Tavaria ....Petitioner
V/S
The Union Of India And 2 Ors
....Respondent
Mr.Anil Dsouza For Petitioner
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sandip Sankarlal Kedia
- petitioner
Unnamed Second Petitioner
- petitioner
Yasmin E. Tavaria
- respondent
Bar Council Of India
- respondent
Union Of India
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Nilesh Mahendra Jamkar Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Education Dept. Mantralaya Mumbai and Others
Mr. Keval Ukey Vs the Chief Justice, Bombay High Court and Ors.
Shri. Vijay Vedpal Piwal Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Janseva Vikas Samiti Vs the Collector of Bombay Suburban Mumbai Suburban District and 6 Ors.