The petitioners sought leave to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 100 of 2011. The Single Judge allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter.
Leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation was granted and the matter was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
10pil100-11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 100 OF 2011
Jitendra A. Maru & Ors. … Petitioners.
Home Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Ors. … Respondents.
Ms. Prabha Badadare, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Parag Vyas, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 09 MARCH, 2017
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Public Interest Litigation.
Allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
( P.R. BORA, J) (V.M.KANADE, J)
1/1
Borey
Jitendra A. Maru & Ors.
Home Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
