Disposed
Mr. Keval Ukey v. the Chief Justice, Bombay High Court and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/27/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PILST37.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PIL STAMP NO. 37 OF 2017
Mr. Keval Ukey … Petitioner Vs 1. The Chief Justice, Bombay High Court & Ors. ... Respondents
Dr. Suresh T. Mane for the Petitioner.
Mr. Milind Sathe, senior counsel with Mr. Rahul Nerlekar for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mrs. M.S. Bane, 'B' Panel counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
THURSDAY, 16TH MARCH, 2017
P.C. :
1 Dr. Mane, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner states that after considering the position, the petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition, though it is a Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to file an appropriate proceeding.
2 The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
B.P. COLABAWALLA, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
SRP 1/1
Mr. Keval Ukey
The Chief Justice, Bombay High Court & Ors.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court