Petitioner sought restoration of possession after removal of illegal construction. Court directed respondent to demarcate and restore possession within four weeks.
Directed CIDCO to place petitioner in possession within four weeks after demarcating the allotted area.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 7446-14 @ CAW 366-17.doc-8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7446 OF 2014
ALONG WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.366 OF 2017
Hariprasad S/o Mahavir Shukla. ] … Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] … Respondents
Mr. S. S. Dube for Petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State - Respondent No.1. Mr. B. B. Sharma for CIDCO - Respondent No.2. Ms. Monica Haseja a/w Mr. Ashish Mehta i/b Ashish Mehta for Intervener.
CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- 9 MARCH, 2017
P. C. :-
URS 1 of 2
2 WP 7446-14 @ CAW 366-17.doc-8
the petitioner in possession of the property alloted to him after demarcating the area, subject to payment of necessary fees, etc. by the petitioner.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
2 of 2
URS
HARIPRASAD S/O MAHAVIR SHUKLA
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
CIDCO
MANJULA CHELLUR
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
