In a Public Interest Litigation, the High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner showed no desire to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.66/2014(11)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 66 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1371 OF 2013
Akil Sohrab Bhompuri & Anr.
...Petitioners
Vs.
United Welfare Association Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioners
Mr. Anuj Narula i/b. Jhangiani Narula & Associates for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Ms. Uma Palsuledesai AGP for the State
CORAM : V.M.KANADE &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 18TH MARCH, 2016
P.C. :
Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents. It appears that the petitioner is not keen in pursuing the petition. Hence the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)
Akil Sohrab Bhompuri & Anr.
United Welfare Association Mumbai & Ors.
V.M. Kanade
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
