This PIL petition concerning tendering was disposed of by the court accepting the State's assurance that the grievance will be examined and work completed within stipulated time.
Petition disposed on State's assurance that grievance will be examined and work completed on time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
908-PIL-50-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 50 OF 2016
Appasaheb Babaji Patil & Anr .. Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. M. A. Patil for petitioners.
Mr. C. P. Yadav for State – respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 7 and 8. Mr. V. D. Patil for respondent nos. 6 and 9.
CORAM: D. H. WAGHELA, C. J. AND M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 15 MARCH 2016
P.C.:
1] Without going into the issues as to whether this is a genuine public interest litigation or not, we accept the statement made on behalf of the State and respondent no. 6 that the grievance in this petition will be examined by them and further, steps will be taken to complete the work as tendered on 9 December 2015 within the time stipulated.
2] This petition is disposed of by accepting the statement as aforesaid.
CHIEF JUSTICE
chandka
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grievance regarding tender completion will be examined and steps taken within stipulated time?
Appasaheb Babaji Patil
State of Maharashtra
D. H. Waghela
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
