Disposed
Yogesh B. Mehta v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/106/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2013) vat IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
(WP 1532 of 2013)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No. 216 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION No. 1532 OF 2013
Yogesh B. Mehta ...Applicant In the matter between Yogesh B. Mehta …Petitioner Vs. Municipal Commissioner of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ...Respondents
******
Mr.Kunal Bhanage for Applicant/Petitioner Mr.Sahil Saiyed i/b. Wadia & Ghandy & Co. for Respondent No.6 ******
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 17, 2016
P.C. :
March, 2016. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has mentioned the matter and made a request that the matter may be restored. We have asked
the Petitioner to take out a separate notice of motion for restoration.
2/2
(WP 1532 of 2013)
Accordingly the Petitioner has taken out a separate application for restoration. It is submitted that the counsel for the Petitioner was busy in another court when the matter was called out and therefore, could not remain present.
M.S. KARNIK, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Yogesh B. Mehta
Municipal Commissioner of Greater Mumbai
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court