Held that the writ petition is infructuous as the tender for sand excavation has been executed and the excavation period expired. The petition is disposed of without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 124-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 124 OF 2015
Pravin Ganpatrao Kadam … Petitioner Vs. Prakash Haribhau Londhe & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Akshay Kapadia i/b J. Shekhar & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. V. B. Thadani, AGP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 21, 2016
PC.
. In our view, petition has become infructuous since tender for excavation of sand was granted in favour of Respondent No. 1 till the end of September, 2015. Since the period of excavation in the tender is over, petition has become infructuous. Reserving the right of the Petitioner to file a fresh petition, if necessary, writ petition is disposed of.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Pravin Ganpatrao Kadam
Prakash Haribhau Londhe & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
