The High Court disposed of this PIL by accepting the State's assurance that the contract tendered on 9 December 2015 would be completed within the stipulated time.
None granted; petition disposed of upon State's assurance to complete work on time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
908-PIL-50-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 50 OF 2016
Appasaheb Babaji Patil & Anr .. Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. M. A. Patil for petitioners.
Mr. C. P. Yadav for State – respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 7 and 8. Mr. V. D. Patil for respondent nos. 6 and 9.
CORAM: D. H. WAGHELA, C. J. AND M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 15 MARCH 2016
P.C.:
1] Without going into the issues as to whether this is a genuine public interest litigation or not, we accept the statement made on behalf of the State and respondent no. 6 that the grievance in this petition will be examined by them and further, steps will be taken to complete the work as tendered on 9 December 2015 within the time stipulated.
2] This petition is disposed of by accepting the statement as aforesaid.
CHIEF JUSTICE
chandka
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
1 of 1
Appasaheb Babaji Patil
State of Maharashtra
D. H. Waghela
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
