Dismissed
Mr. Vikram Vishnu Garasia v. the State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary, and 7 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/59/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
nil
What did the court decide?
nil
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 59-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 59 OF 2014
Vikram Vishnu Garasia … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. G. R. Shastri, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 3. Mr. J. G. Reddy, for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Roop M. Vasudeo, for Respondent No. 6.
*** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 21, 2016
PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner when the matter is called out. It appears that Petitioner is not keen in pursuing the petition. PIL is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/Sd/[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Vikram Vishnu Garasia
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court