IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Liberty to withdraw the petition and make a representation to the State Government to reduce grant deduction percentage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
PIL94-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.94/2015 (Sau. Mangala Shrikrishna Patil and another .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. N.A. Gaikwad, Advocate for Petitioners. Ms. R.V. Kalia, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & A.S. Chandurkar, JJ. DATED : March 17, 2016.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with further liberty to make a representation to the State Government to reduce the percentage of the deduction of grants. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the State Government. We make it clear that the State Government would decide the said representation on merits as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of making the said representation.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Mangala Shrikrishna Patil
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
