This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
PIL51.09
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.51 OF 2009 With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8 OF 2009 IN PIL NO.51 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders.
None present for the petitioner. None present for the respondents.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2012. P.C.:
Counsel for the petitioner absent. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
D.D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
