Dismissed
Shivaji Dattatray Pawar v. the Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/29/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL-29-10
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 29 OF 2010
Shivaji Dattatray Pawar ..Petitioner versus The Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents
None for Petitioner. Ms. Neha Thakkar i/b. ALMT Legal for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 10 October 2012
P.C. :
Counsel for the petitioner absent. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
1/1
Shivaji Dattatray Pawar
The Union of India
D. D. Sinha
Smt. V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court