Petitioner withdrew Public Interest Litigation No. 91 of 2010; High Court of Bombay kept issues open and disposed of matter as withdrawn.
PIL disposed of as withdrawn with issues kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
PIL91.10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.91 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.Harshad E. Palwe for the petitioner. Ms Neha Palshikar Bhide, A.G.P. for resp. nos.2 to 6. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2012.
P.C.:
Counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the present PIL and prays that the issues raised in the PIL may kindly be kept open. In the circumstances, the PIL is disposed of as withdrawn by keeping the issues open.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 of 1
Petitioner (Unidentified)
Respondent Nos. 2 to 6
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
