Dismissed
Vijay Mishra and Others v. Union of India and Another
Bombay HCCAW/2545/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
caw2545.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2545 OF 2012
In WRIT PETITION NO.3428 OF 2006
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions
Court’s or Judge’s orders
and Registrar’s orders.
None present for the applicants. None present for the respondents.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2012. P.C.:
This Civil Application is for early hearing of the Writ Petition. The counsel for the applicants is absent. Even otherwise, in view of old Writ Petitions pending for final hearing, it is not possible for us, at this stage, to grant the request made by the applicants. Hence, the Civil Application is dismissed.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 of 1
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court