The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, granted permission and dismissed the PIL as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Permission to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation; dismissal with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1910pil101.12.odt
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
P.I.L. No. 101 of 2012
Mohan Marotrao Karemore
...Versus...
State of Maharashtra & ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directio ns and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.J. Khandalkar Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM : P.V. Hardas & A.P. Bhangale, JJ. DATE : 19.10.2012.
Mr. Khandalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states on instructions that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw this Public Interest Litigation. We accordingly grant permission to the petitioner for withdrawal of this Public Interest Litigation and dismiss the same as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
/TA/
Mohan Marotrao Karemore
State of Maharashtra & ors.
P.V. Hardas
A.P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court