Public Interest Litigation regarding pension benefits was dismissed as infructuous by the Nagpur Bench as the Anti Corruption Bureau had already initiated an enquiry on the matter.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1910pil55.12.odt
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
P.I.L. No. 55 of 2012
Kishor Samrite & anr.
...Versus...
State of Maharashtra & ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directio ns and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Pande h/f Mr. Bhandarkar Advocate for Petitioners.
CORAM : P.V. Hardas & A.P. Bhangale, JJ.
DATE : 19.10.2012.
Mr.Pande, learned counsel for the petitioners, states on instructions that the reliefs which the petitioners have prayed for in this petition are rendered infructuous in the light of the fact that the Anti Corruption Bureau has initiated enquiry in respects of the reliefs which the petitioners have prayed for in this petition.
We accordingly dismiss this Public Interest Litigation as infructuous on the basis of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
1910pil55.12.odt
2/2
/TA/
Kishor Samrite S/o Late Sharad Samrite
State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
A.P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court