Court permitted withdrawal of Public Interest Litigation No. 38 of 2011 in light of a prior decision by this Court, allowing petitioner to take steps at the appropriate forum.
PIL disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chandka
PIL-38-11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 38 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr. R. S. Datar for Petitioner.
Mr. A. V. Nikam for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 29 March 2012
P.C. :
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present PIL in view of the decision of this Court dated 27.4.2005 rendered in PIL no. 105 of 2003 in order to take appropriate steps in this regard before the appropriate forum.
In the circumstances, PIL is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1/1
Petitioner
Respondent No. 1
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
