Petitioners sought to withdraw PIL 19/12/2008 with liberty to file a fresh petition; court granted leave.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
pil(l) 19/12
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 18 OF 2012
Mumbai Taximen Sangathan & Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents.
All the Petitioners are present in person Mr. S.K.Nair A Panel counsel for the State.
Coram : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 22, 2012 .
P. C. :
Mr. Sanjay Khemani, who is general secretary of petitioner no.1 – Mumbai Taximen Sangathan, as well as petitioner nos.2 to 4, who are present before the Court, state that they are desirous of withdrawing this petition with liberty to file fresh petition.
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
Mumbai Taximen Sangathan
State of Maharashtra
MOHIT S. SHAH
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
