Writ petition challenging refund of security deposit is disposed of as withdrawn in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay due to information received that the deposit was already refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sk
wp4947.10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.4947 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.Mahesh D. Sahasrabuddhe i/b. Mr.Sarang Aradhye for the petitioner. Ms D.S.Mondkar for resp. nos.1 & 2. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, A.G.P. for resp. nos.3 to 5.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 27, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and the learned counsel or the respective respondents.
(c) of the petition, direction is sought to the respondent nos.1 and 2 to refund the amount
deposited by the petitioner towards Security Deposit in connection with the work in
1 of 2
sk
wp4947.10
question. It is submitted that information is received that the said deposit has been refunded by the respondent nos.1 & 2 and, therefore, the cause of action involved in this petition no more survives.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
2 of 2
Petitioner
Respondents 1 & 2
Respondents 3 to 5
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
