This petition, filed regarding surplus land disposal, was dismissed as the Apex Court's decision in State of Kerala precluded the claimed reliefs, and the State Government has issued a government resolution on the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.pil.35.09.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PIL NO. 35 OF 2009
Bhaskar Kisanrao Gowardhane
..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. M.S.Karnik for petitioner Mr. Nitin Deshpande AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J.
DATE : OCTOBER 04, 2012.
P.C.:
State of Kerala and others Vs. M. Bhaskaran Pillai and another1 in particular paragraph 4, the reliefs as claimed in this petition, cannot be countenanced.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. ]
kandarkar
1 (1997) 5 SCC 432
Pg 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim for disposal of surplus lands by public action can be countenanced in light of the Apex Court's decision in State of Kerala.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Kerala and others Vs. M. Bhaskaran Pillai and anotherFollowed¶13
(1997) 5 SCC 432 · Who else cites this
Bhaskar Kisanrao Gowardhane
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
