Petitioner withdrew the PIL submission that disputes were settled during pendency. The petition was disposed of accordingly. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.pil.174.07.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PIL NO. 174 OF 2007
Madhukar Digamber Akotkar
..Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. V.N.Bolinjkar i/b K.K. Malpathak for petitioner
Mr. Nitin Deshpande AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Mr. Y.S.Bhate along with N.R.Prajapati for Respondent Nos. 1 and 6
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J.
DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2012.
P.C.:
employees and the Bank have been mutually settled. As a result, the petitioner is not interested in persuing this petition having become infructous.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. ]
kandarkar
Pg 1 of 1
Madhukar Digamber Akotkar
Union of India & Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
