In a Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner did not appear when the matter was called. The petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
None. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO. 116 OF 2010
Sunil Kumar Bavdhankar .. Petitioner
Vs
K.V. Sodmise & Ors. .. Respondents
None Present
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C.:
1. None appears for the Petitioner when the matter is called
out.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Sunil Kumar Bavdhankar
K.V. Sodmise & Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
Smt. V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
