Disposed
Abdul Nasir Abdul Samad Jalal v. Divisional Commissoner, Konkan Division and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/113/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO. 113 OF 2011
Abdul Nasir Abdul Samad Jalal
.. Petitioner
Vs
Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division & Ors.
.. Respondents
Ms. Ushajee Peri for the Petitioner
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 3rd OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C.:
relief claimed in this petition has become infructous. She prays for withdrawal of this petition leaving all questions in this petition open.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Abdul Nasir Abdul Samad Jalal
Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division
A.M. Khanwilkar
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court