In this PIL challenging an auction notice, the State AGP stated the auction was completed. Finding nothing survived, the court dismissed the petition without merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.1.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 1 OF 2012
| Sameer Vijay Thakekar versus |
:- | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| State of Maharashtra & Ors. | :- | Respondents |
None for the Petitioner. Mr. Nitin Deshpande, AGP, for Respondent State.
CORAM:-A.M.KHANWILKAR &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED:-OCTOBER 4, 2012
P.C.:-
None appears for the Petitioner.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Sameer Vijay Thakekar
State of Maharashtra
A.M.Khanwilkar
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court