The High Court of Bombay dismissed a PIL filed by the petitioner. The Assistant Government Pleader stated that the scheme would be implemented subject to financial constraints. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition with no further action required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO. 16 OF 2011
Hemraj Hiraman Rupawate .. Petitioner
Vs
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mrs. Neha Palshikar-Bhide 'B' Panel counsel for the Respondents
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C.:
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Hemraj Hiraman Rupawate
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
