Public Interest Litigation PIL 157 of 2010 wherein the petitioner was absent and the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
PIL157.10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.157 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None present for the petitioner. Ms J.S.Pawar, Addl. G.P. for resp. nos.1 & 3.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2012.
P.C.:
Counsel for the petitioner absent. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 of 1
Petitioner
D.D. SINHA
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
