Petitioners sought to withdraw a contempt petition to pursue a writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal with liberty as prayed and left all questions open.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-310.12.doc
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.310 OF 2012
Rajaram Kedari Powar, Deceased through legal heirs, a) Dattatraya Rajaram Powar & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.P.S.Dani a/w Mr.Manoj Patil for Petitioners.
Ms.P.S.Cardozo, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 4, 2012.
P.C.
to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All questions are left open.
( SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
1/1
SQ Pathan
Rajaram Kedari Powar, Deceased through legal heirs
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
