Disposed

Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena v. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC10 Oct 2007WP/1704/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of multiple writ petitions concerning the Security Guards Board by referring to recent judgments without providing detailed reasoning. The time period for these petitions was extended by four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed in terms of reasons stated in referenced judgments; period extended by four weeks.

Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.1704 OF 2007

¶4

Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Sena Vs.

¶5

Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay & Thane Dist. and others

..Petitioner.

..Respondents.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.2011 OF 2006

¶10

Sharad R. Shirawadekar and another Vs.

¶11

The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others

..Petitioners.

..Respondents.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.1872 OF 2007

¶16

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others

..Petitioner.

..Respondents.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.1901 OF 2007

¶21

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others

..Petitioner.

..Respondents.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.1911 OF 2007

¶26

Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena Vs.

¶27

..Petitioner.

¶28

The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others ..Respondents.

¶29

¶30

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1951 OF 2007

¶31

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others

..Petitioner.

..Respondents.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.1987 OF 2007

¶36

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others

¶37

..Petitioner.

¶38

..Respondents.

¶39

WITH WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.2151 OF 2007

¶40

Prakash Rajaram Patil Vs.

¶41

The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others

..Petitioner.

..Respondents.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.1710 OF 2007

¶46

Sarjerao Vishnu Deshmukh Vs.

¶47

The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District and others

¶48

..Petitioner.

¶49

..Respondents.

¶50

Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the Petitioners.

¶51

Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar i/b Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the Petitioner (in Writ Petition 1951 of 2007).

¶52

Mr. M.S. Topkar for Respondent No.1 (in Writ Petitions 1704/07, 1710/07, 1872/07, 1901/07, 1951/07, 1987/07, WP(L) 2151/07).

¶53

Ms. Lata Desai i/b Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No.1 (in Writ

¶54

¶55

Petitions 2011/07 and 1911/07.

¶56

Mr. P.K. Rele with Mr. R.P. Rele and Mr. Piyush Shah for Respondent No.2 (in Writ Petition 2011 of 2006).

¶57

CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 10^th October, 2007.

¶58

P.C. :

¶59

The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present Petitions is covered by recent judgments of this Court in Writ Petition NO.563 of 2007 dated 21^st June, 2007 and Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 1323 of 2007 dated 19^th July, 2007. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the reasons stated therein. However, the period stated in the order shall stand extended for a period of four weeks from today.

¶60

No order as to costs.

¶61

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶62

DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena v. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena v. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Maharashtra through Spl.Land Acq.Officer. Vs Dipak Vasanji Thakkar and Ors.

State of Maharashtra. Vs Roshanlal Lachiram Agarwal and Anr.

Shri Pradeep Mohanlal Kankariya Vs the Commoissioner of Income Tax and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Vs Madhavnath Baburao Tamboli

Dena Bank Vs Dr. Pranjivan Purshottam Zaveri and 3 Ors.

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs the Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District and 2 Ors.