The court recorded that the Public Interest Litigation No. 94 of 2007 had been dismissed earlier, and Civil Applications seeking restoration of the PIL had also been dismissed. The brief order orders the file to be reconsigned to the Record without any substantive reasoning or decision on the instant applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(12) PIL 94-07
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 94 OF 2007
Dr. Suresh Marotrao Yeole .. Petitioner
Vs.
Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & NITIN JAMDAR, J. DATE : 9 th AUGUST, 2019.
P. C. :
[NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
Dr. Suresh Marotrao Yeole
Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation
Pradeep Nandrajog
Nitin Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
