The State of Maharashtra represented that it would consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders. As no substantive issue remained, the Public Interest Litigation was disposed of without costs.
The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of; each party to bear own costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 110 OF 2007
Ambadas Ambaji Kudkyal
....Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents
Mr. S.U. Dhakephalkar for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for the respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATE: DECEMBER 06, 2007 .
P.C.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the
respondents states that the State Government will consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 19th July, 2007, at Exhibit-F to the petition, and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in this PIL. The same is disposed of accordingly, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
-2-
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Ambadas Ambaji Kudkyal
The State of Maharashtra
SWATANTER KUMAR
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
