Public Interest Litigation disposed of after respondents state appeal is fixed for hearing. Parties to bear own costs.
Parties to bear their own costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 180 OF 2007
Shailendra Pandit Pawar
...Petitioner
versus
The Commissioner of Sugar and others
... Respondents
Mr. Tejesh Dande for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, for the State. Mr. S.M. Sabrad for respondent No.5.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATE: DECEMBER 06, 2007 .
P.C.
It is stated on behalf of the respondents that the appeal is
fixed for hearing on 10th December, 2007 and appropriate orders will be passed expeditiously. In view of the statement, nothing survives in this PIL. The same is disposed of accordingly, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Shailendra Pandit Pawar
The Commissioner of Sugar
SWATANTER KUMAR
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
