Dr. Suresh Marotrao Yeoale v. Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss : 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.101 OF 2007
a/w
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.94 OF 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda¦ Court’s or Judge’s
of Coram, appearances, Court’s¦ Orders
Order or Directions and ¦
Registrar’s Orders ¦
-------------------------------------------------------------------
None for the Petitioner
Mr.R.S.Apte for Respondent No.1
Mr.S.M. Oka for Respondent No.2
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
SMT.NISHITAMHATRE, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2007
P.C.:
. None for the Petitioner.
Hence, the matters are dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(J.N. PATEL, J.)
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)
J.N. PATEL
SMTE NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court