Attar Mohiuddin Gajabarsaheb v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing four unrelated writ petitions as infructuous without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4523 OF 2006
Mr.Attar Mohiuddin Gajabarsaheb .. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.5161 OF 2007
Shri Mali Omprakash Kisanrao & Anr.Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.5189 OF 2007
Miss Sujata Madhukar Deshmukh
& Anr. .. Petitioners
Vs.
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7467 OF 2005
Mrs.Wagh Varsha Avadhut & Ors. .. Petitioners
Vs.
The Authorisation Committee & Ors..Respondents
2
Mr.U.P.Warunjikar for the petitioners
Mr.R.B.Raghuwanshi, Additional Solicitor General
with Ms.S.V.Bharucha for respondent/Union of India
Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General with
Mr.V.P.Malvankar, A.G.P. for the respondent/State
Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, for Ruby Hall Clinic
CORAM : J.N.PATEL &
SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED : 11TH DECEMBER, 2007
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that all the petitions have become
infructuous. Therefore, they are dismissed as
infructuous.
( J.N. PATEL, J )
( SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J )
Attar Mohiuddin Gajabarsaheb
Mali Omprakash Kisanrao
Sujata Madhukar Deshmukh
Varsha Avadhut Wagh
State of Maharashtra
Union of India
J.N. Patel
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court