Shaikh Budan Abu and Ors. v. Amina Bagam Miravahedali and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay dismissed both numbered civil applications as they were not pressed by the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2378 OF 2002 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.925 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5122 OF 2001
Shaikh Budan Abu & Ors. Vs. Sau. Amina Begam w/o. Mirvahedali Pirjade & Ors.
...Applicants.
...Respondents.
Mr. A. N. Mulla for the Applicants.
..... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
October 24, 2007 .
P.C. :
Both the Civil Applications are dismissed as not pressed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Shaikh Budan Abu & Ors.
Sau. Amina Begam w/o. Mirvahedali Pirjade & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court