Santosh Babanrao Walke and Anr. v. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as the petitioners withdrew the PIL after filing representations with the authorities concerned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
P I L No.139 of 2007
Santosh B Walke and anr
.. Petitioners
vs
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd and ors
..Respondents
Mr Bhushan Salunke for Mr P B Shah for petitioners
Mr Surip Sen with Mr. Sharad Abhyankar and Ms Snehal Shroff i/b ANS Law Associates for respondent No.1.
Mr P.M. Patil AGP for State
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., &
Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Dated: 1st November 2007
P.C.:
The learned counsel for petitioners wishes to withdraw the
petition since they have filed certain representation before the authorities concerned.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Santosh B Walke
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court