The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the PIL writ petition as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PIL WRIT PETITION NO.50 OF 2005
Sanjaykumar Surve ..Petitioner vs The State of Mah and ors ..Respondents
Mr Kishor Shriyan for petitioner Mr.P.M.Patil AGP respondent Nos 1 and 2 Mr. A.A. Garge for respondent no. 4 Ms Sowmya Srikrishna i/b Kanga and Co for applicants in CA 2 of 2007
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Dated: 7th June 2007
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
instructions to withdraw this petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the disposal of the main petition, civil application, if any does not survive.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Sanjaykumar Surve
The State of Mah
Swatanter Kumar
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
