Dismissed
Anil Agarwal v. Union of India and Anr.
Bombay HCPIL/27/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO.27 OF 2006
Anil Agarwal .. Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Anr. .. Respondents
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 13th June 2007.
P.C.
. Nobody is present on behalf of
petitioner. None has been appearing for
petitioner even on previous dates. It appears
nobody is interested in prosecuting this
petition. Petition dismissed for non
prosecution.
(Swatanter Kumar, C.J.)
2
(S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)
Anil Agarwal
Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court