The PIL writ petition (No. 12 of 2005) was dismissed because the petitioner and nobody appeared, despite the court's adjournment to allow justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PIL WRIT PETITION NO.12 OF 2005
Bal Ganesh Foundation ..Petitioner
vs
Collector Nasik, and ors
..Respondents
None appears.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Dated: 7th June 2007
P.C.:
Nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion . However, in the interest of justice we deferred the orders and the matter was directed to be listed today. Even today nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that nobody is interested in prosecuting this petition. Same is dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Bal Ganesh Foundation
Collector Nasik
Swatanter Kumar
S.C. Dharas Appealed
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
